In the United States, the Walton family is known for making it their mission to make their philanthropy more widely known.
This includes publishing books, speaking on the subject and sponsoring conferences and events.
However, the company also has a reputation for offering financial aid packages that range from $5,000 to $25,000 per year.
One such package was announced by Wal-mart this week to help students get into a prestigious university, and the offer was described by one student as a “must-have scholarship”.
But how does the company judge what it’s actually offering to students?
A new research paper from Oxford University suggests that Wal-marts scholarship is not only based on how much money the company makes, but also the quality of the scholarship package.
The paper is based on a new tool developed by researchers at Oxford’s Business School and the University of California, Berkeley, which looks at how much the university and other companies can do to help fund a student’s education.
The tool, called the Oxford Scholarship Scorecard, tracks the value of scholarship and financial aid offered to students in the US.
If the scorecard shows a company to be providing a good scholarship package, it’s likely to be rewarded with financial aid.
This could mean that companies that offer financial aid will be more likely to recommend the company for future funding.
In a recent study, for example, one of the companies that the researchers evaluated was the insurance giant UnitedHealthcare.
In that study, the researchers found that the company was awarded the highest scores in a number of categories, including student retention, attendance, retention in classes and graduation rates.
But what’s really interesting about the company’s scorecard is how it compared with other companies.
For example, the University at Buffalo, which received the highest score in retention, graduation and retention rates, was ranked 17th in terms of the value the company is giving out in scholarships and grants.
The researchers also looked at the company itself, and found that UnitedHealthCare scored much higher in terms that it’s offering scholarships and financial grants.
They found that when the company gave out financial aid to students, it had a very positive impact on their overall well-being.
“What we found is that United HealthCare has been particularly generous in its financial aid programs,” said Dr David Hsu, lead author of the study.
“It is a huge help to our students.
Our findings show that financial aid is more valuable to students who attend university, as opposed to students whose financial aid was given by a private institution.”
“In the end, we think that a lot of the impact is driven by how the financial aid program is structured,” he added.
The findings suggest that, in order to improve the value that students receive, companies need to improve how they present financial aid in their scholarship packages.
“In terms of giving out financial support, companies that provide financial aid should be much more transparent,” said Hsu.
“I would argue that the best way to do that is to use a data analysis tool, such as this one, that helps companies evaluate the value provided by their financial aid.”
The research was published in the Journal of Applied Finance and Economics, and was funded by the UK’s Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.
The article was first published on Monday 26 September 2018.
Follow New Scientist on Twitter @NewScientist